Teams

Sons of Forest Hills

2024 Montgomery Adult 65 & Over · Montgomery Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFrederick Duque / Juan Rivas vs Terry Austin / Timothy Brown4-6, 4-6
2024-08-13vs Down The MiddleLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard McKeon / Peter Davis vs William Trimble / Mike Chatman0-6, 3-6
2024-08-01vs Down The MiddleWon 10
W#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Richard McKeon vs Alan Bruzee / John Francis6-0, 6-2
2024-07-21vs Down The MiddleWon 10
W#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Frederick Duque vs Peter Bonaccorsi / Mike Chatman6-2, 6-1
2024-07-15vs Down The MiddleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Weikel / Juan Rivas vs Timothy Brown / Robert Vinson6-0, 6-2
2024-07-09vs Down The MiddleWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Michael Berman vs Robert Vinson / John Francis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Dennis Weikel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
James Forbes
published
3.25
Gerald McClellan
published
Bassem Melhem
published 3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
published 3.5
3.11
Frederick Duque
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Robert Seidel
published
2.91
Konrad Huppi
published
2.87
Juan Rivas
published
2.85
Brian Sadur
published 3
2.63
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Malcolm Frazier
published
Hugo Frega
published
Ivan Teelucksingh
published
William Halfpap
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Rivas + Richard McKeon2443% games−8.3% vs expected
Dennis Weikel + Richard McKeon91648% gamesnot enough data
Brian Sadur + Richard McKeon5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55
James Forbes
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Gerald McClellan
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bassem Melhem
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Frederick Duque
52W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Robert Seidel
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Konrad Huppi
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Juan Rivas
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Brian Sadur
72W–85L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Malcolm Frazier
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.34
Hugo Frega
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Halfpap
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.