Teams

DCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.61 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-22vs GTC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Connelly / Heather Benes vs Theress Pidick / Brooke O'Drobinak6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Valerie Imperial5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKate Lively / Sara McDonnell vs Elizabeth Bernadette / Catherine Hance6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Groves / Dory Pratt vs Kelly Nordini / MacAyla Hansen6-2, 6-4
2023-07-13vs CACM GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Harry / Jennifer Connelly vs Inessa McGill / Cathy O'Neill6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Lively / Sara McDonnell vs Mary Mathis / Samantha Hanson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDory Pratt / Julie Groves vs Stephanie Slaybaugh / Karen Collier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-06vs CM PINKWon 21
L#1 SinglesLindsay Filsinger vs Taylor Pardun1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDory Pratt / Jennifer Connelly vs Mary Vivo / Michelle Eidson7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGina Carbone Fenton / Heather Benes vs Margaret Deline / Holly Flannigan7-5, 6-4
2023-06-29vs WP REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Harry / Jennifer Connelly vs Claire Uman / Kris Staaf-Bendixen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGina Carbone Fenton / Robyn Larkin vs Barbara Deboer / Nichole Milton6-4, 6-3
2023-06-22vs CP GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Lively / Sara McDonnell vs Jodi Denton / Katai Itta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGina Carbone Fenton / Heather Benes vs Tammy Chamberlain / Alexandra Hopkins7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDory Pratt / Jennifer Connelly vs Sarah Gilbert / Karen Ikegami6-3, 6-0
2023-06-15vs DTC REDWon 30
W#1 SinglesTia Wolkov vs Jann Peterson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKate Lively / Heather Benes vs Karen Polzin / Kathleen Andrews6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobyn Larkin / Jennifer Connelly vs Julie Underdahl / Migdalia Morillo Rettig6-2, 6-2
2023-06-08vs CACM BLACKWon 20
W#2 DoublesTia Wolkov / Heather Benes vs Helene Grall-Johnson / Nancy Harlow-Irwin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Harry / Jennifer Connelly vs Brandis Becky / Michelle Odenbach6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Robyn Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Lindsay Filsinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Tia Wolkov
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Sara McDonnell
published
3.31
Brooke Simpson
published 3.5
3.23
Gina Carbone Fenton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kendra Connors
published
3.16
Dory Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Heather Benes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Megan Harry
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Jennifer Connelly
published
3.08
Kate Lively
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Julie Groves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Simpson + Sara McDonnell4254% games+3.0% vs expected
Heather Benes + Gina Carbone Fenton271353% games+2.7% vs expected
Dory Pratt + Robyn Larkin10457% games+1.5% vs expected
Megan Harry + Kate Lively3448% games−1.7% vs expected
Dory Pratt + Gina Carbone Fenton2348% games−11.6% vs expected
Robyn Larkin + Kate Lively5262% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Larkin + Lindsay Filsinger5165% gamesnot enough data
Dory Pratt + Lindsay Filsinger5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robyn Larkin
65W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Lindsay Filsinger
106W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Tia Wolkov
108W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Sara McDonnell
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brooke Simpson
26W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Gina Carbone Fenton
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kendra Connors
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dory Pratt
66W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Heather Benes
60W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Megan Harry
38W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Connelly
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kate Lively
63W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Julie Groves
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.