Teams

WI 2.5 Metro W Watson

2025 WI Adult 18 & Over Metro · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Watson / Kristy Merten vs Karen Stern / Lorna Dilley4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinnea Emerson / Caitlin Noonan vs Leesa Ranicke / Rachel van Pay4-6, 3-6
2025-07-22vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Watson / Linnea Emerson vs Majka Drewitz / Deanna Weddig7-5, 6-3
2025-07-15vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Watson / Kristy Merten vs Leesa Ranicke / Deanna Weddig6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Reyes / Linnea Emerson vs Lorna Dilley / Karen Stern6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Watson / Carole Nicksin vs Rachel van Pay / Deanna Weddig2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLinnea Emerson vs Karen Stern6-3, 6-2
2025-07-01vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Reyes / Carole Nicksin vs Leesa Ranicke / Rachel van Pay6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesChristine Drummond vs Majka Drewitz0-6, 2-6
2025-06-24vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristy Merten / Carole Nicksin vs Lorna Dilley / Leesa Ranicke7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristine Drummond vs Karen Stern4-6, 1-6
2025-06-17vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Nicksin / Cynthia Reyes vs Leesa Ranicke / Rachel van Pay6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Drummond vs Deanna Weddig0-6, 3-6
2025-06-10vs WI 2.5 Metro W RanickeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Nicksin / Kristy Merten vs Lorna Dilley / Majka Drewitz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Watson vs Deanna Weddig4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI 2.5 Metro W Ranicke62141022198
2WI 2.5 Metro W Watson2651938263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Linnea Emerson
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.29
Anna Watson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.29
Caitlin Noonan
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Christine Drummond
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Carole Nicksin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 2.5
2.04
Kristy Merten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Watson + Kristy Merten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linnea Emerson
4W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Anna Watson
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Caitlin Noonan
8W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Christine Drummond
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carole Nicksin
20W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Kristy Merten
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.