Teams

Claussen, Jan

2022 Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-29vs HOA/Bennett/18&OverMXD8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBlake Thorne / Dina Mitchell vs Ankush Oberoi / Claire Thimgan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Carrie Cooper vs Jeff Thimgan / Natalie Thimgan2-6, 2-6
2022-07-15vs Hambrick, ErinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBlake Thorne / Amanda Miller vs Joshua Freeman / Ada Kechy2-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesLara Maple / Jeff Ganaden vs Thomas Brawner / Emily Fike7-5, 6-3
2022-06-24vs HOA/Bennett/18&OverMXD8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLara Maple / Blake Thorne vs Robin Foderberg / Jason Shindler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Amber Gonzalez vs Mitchell Bennett / Allyson Braun2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Ganaden / Dina Mitchell vs Jill Burgdorfer / Anthony Seim2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-06-17vs Hambrick, ErinWon 21
W#1 DoublesLara Maple / Jeff Ganaden vs Ada Kechy / Ryan Wall6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Miller / R Scott Hanover vs Ruth Knox / Viliamu Vaofanua5-7, 4-5
W#3 DoublesJan Claussen / Carrie Cooper vs Erin Hambrick / Thomas Brawner7-6, 4-3
2022-06-03vs HOA/Bennett/18&OverMXD8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJan Claussen / Heidi Hoggatt vs Claire Thimgan / Christopher Wiedmeyer4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Miller / Blake Thorne vs Jeff Thimgan / Natalie Thimgan6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLara Maple / Jeff Ganaden vs Jill Burgdorfer / Anthony Seim6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Bennett/18&OverMXD8.05114410119
2Hambrick, Erin236920137
3Claussen, Jan1441124167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dina Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
Blake Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.82
Lara Maple
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Jan Claussen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Amber Heineman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Carrie Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Jeff Ganaden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Heidi Hoggatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Noah Aschemann
published
R Scott Hanover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Maple + Jan Claussen8159% games+8.6% vs expected
Jeff Ganaden + Lara Maple15955% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dina Mitchell
174W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Blake Thorne
65W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Lara Maple
152W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jan Claussen
91W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amber Heineman
34W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Carrie Cooper
62W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Ganaden
118W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Heidi Hoggatt
90W–71L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Noah Aschemann
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
R Scott Hanover
30W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.