Teams

Wolson / Geherin - Honey Deuce

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-06-20vs Sundick- ORCC WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Wolson / Stephanie Crowl vs Rachel Bowron / Rachel Dietrich6-4, 6-4
2022-06-13vs JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Crowl / Sherri Wolson vs Allison Gunther / Joyce Rosenbery3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Danielle Schwier
published 4
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
3.57
Kirsten Gregerson
published
3.37
Somia Mourad
published
3.36
Kim Wolson
published
3.36
Ann Nachbor
published 3.5
3.36
Stacy Joslin
published
3.34
Dawn Reidinger
published 3.5
3.32
Meaghan Mclaughlin
published
3.28
Kirsten Galloway
published
3.28
Stephanie Sislo
published
3.20
Jennifer Flanigan
published
3.19
Colleen Finnegan
published 3.5
3.17
Kara Dillon
published
3.10
Sherri Wolson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Heather Hoyt
published 3.5
3.08
Kathleen Geherin
published
Kelly Bomier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meaghan Mclaughlin + Kim Wolson8459% games+7.0% vs expected
Somia Mourad + Kirsten Galloway5446% games+3.7% vs expected
Kathleen Geherin + Heather Hoyt2449% games−5.6% vs expected
Colleen Finnegan + Stacy Joslin303 matchesnot enough data
Kim Wolson + Kirsten Galloway213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Flanigan + Kirsten Galloway303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Schwier
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Kirsten Gregerson
40W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
Somia Mourad
20W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Kim Wolson
31W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Ann Nachbor
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Stacy Joslin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dawn Reidinger
111W–146L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Meaghan Mclaughlin
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Kirsten Galloway
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Stephanie Sislo
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer Flanigan
18W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Colleen Finnegan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Kara Dillon
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sherri Wolson
87W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Heather Hoyt
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Geherin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kelly Bomier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.