Teams

Wallace - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-24vs Hyde-White - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Ed Souza vs Gloria Langan / Mark Brabham6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristyn Miller / Jerry Clark vs Hassan Al-Ansari / Mary Bryan6-7, 5-7
2023-09-17vs Hyde-White - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Mary Bryan / Hassan Al-Ansari6-1, 6-2
2023-09-10vs Hyde-White - RS ClaySplit 11
L#2 DoublesKristyn Miller / Jerry Clark vs Mark Brabham / Thuy Nguyen6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Kenneth Wallace vs Jeffrey Powell / Barbara French6-4, 6-3
2023-09-04vs Hyde-White - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Alex Hyde-White / Karen Penn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Kenneth Wallace vs Mark Brabham / Libby Covington6-2, 6-2
2023-08-28vs Hyde-White - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Mark Brabham / Becky Siegel6-3, 6-4
2023-08-20vs Hyde-White - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / John Wimberly vs Thuy Nguyen / Alex Hyde-White5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Ed Souza
published
3.25
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Kenneth Wallace
published
3.19
Jerry Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Arturo Ojeda Peraza
published 3.5
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
published
3.11
Susan Bonsignore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Luis Camero
published
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Greskovich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mecy Wimberly + John Wimberly202250% games−15.6% vs expected
Jerry Clark + Kristyn Miller3548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Ed Souza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Kenneth Wallace
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Arturo Ojeda Peraza
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Luis Camero
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Greskovich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.