Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Ferris)(TW#1)

2022 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.0 ADULT MEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-12vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Fierro)(EPTC#2)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesRichard Salazar / Humberto Cardiel vs Robert Burns / Edward Sosa0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Medardo Montoya vs James McCleland / Gerardo Gomez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRichard Mason vs James Houlahan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPierre Lacasse-Jobin / Edgar Borrego vs Alberto Batalla / Jorge Coreano4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRichard Mason / Humberto Cardiel vs Jonathan Prieto / Mauricio Davalos6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAntonio Marquez / Ruben Martinez vs Arvind Singhal / Shady Elias6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarcos Calderon / Carlos Santini vs Arvind Singhal / Will Wautlet2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJOSE MENDEZ vs Octavio Corral2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Salazar / Royce Green vs Colby Genrich / Jonathan Prieto6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-24vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Fierro)(EPTC#2)Split 22
L#1 DoublesCarlos Santini / Medardo Montoya vs Gerardo Gomez / Robert Burns2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Salazar / Royce Green vs Edward Sosa / Alberto Batalla1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHumberto Cardiel vs Omar Pineda6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHector Mendoza / JOSE MENDEZ vs Pat Rodriguez / Manny Casillas6-2, 6-3
2020-08-22vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Mirazo)(EPCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Jones / Royce Green vs Terry Calhoun / Ivan Trachter1-6, 4-6
2020-08-02vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Mirazo)(EPCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Salazar / Scott Jones vs Terry Calhoun / Donald Rhodes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 ADULT MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Humberto Cardiel
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
2.83
Edgar Borrego
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
JOSE MENDEZ
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Antonio Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.19
Hector Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Carlos Santini
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Kevin Woodson
published
Marcos Calderon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Medardo Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Ferris
published
Pierre Lacasse-Jobin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Mason
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Richard Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Royce Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ruben Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carlos Santini + JOSE MENDEZ1437% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Santini + Medardo Montoya224 matchesnot enough data
Antonio Marquez + Kevin Woodson134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Woodson + Hector Mendoza224 matchesnot enough data
Ruben Martinez + Edgar Borrego033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Woodson + Humberto Cardiel213 matchesnot enough data
JOSE MENDEZ + Richard Salazar033 matchesnot enough data
Hector Mendoza + Edgar Borrego033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Humberto Cardiel
54W–63L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3
Edgar Borrego
26W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
JOSE MENDEZ
39W–66L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Antonio Marquez
31W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Hector Mendoza
24W–53L career · 1 line in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Carlos Santini
17W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcos Calderon
22W–27L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Medardo Montoya
38W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Ferris
11W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pierre Lacasse-Jobin
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Richard Mason
18W–31L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Salazar
22W–49L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Royce Green
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruben Martinez
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.