Teams

Hagood/META

2022 Combo 40 & over-META · 6.5 Senior Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Ivanna Stewart
published 4
3.26
Julia Vargo
published
3.14
Ashley McCoy
published 3.5
3.14
Lynne Little
published
3.13
Shannon Hinkle
published
3.03
Anita Jilton
published 3
2.59
Barb Janiszewski
published 3
2.55
Joan Hagood
published
Kim Cartier
published
Rachel Lovelace
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Hagood + Anita Jilton2444% games−4.0% vs expected
Joan Hagood + Barb Janiszewski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ivanna Stewart
25W–17L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Julia Vargo
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ashley McCoy
51W–46L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lynne Little
36W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
Shannon Hinkle
20W–27L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Anita Jilton
36W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Barb Janiszewski
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Joan Hagood
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kim Cartier
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Lovelace
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.