Teams

HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0M

2021 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-27vs Bird, DavidWon 30
W#1 DoublesVernon Shand / Lanny Wake vs Gary Merrill / Berry Wanless6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJan Claussen / R Scott Hanover vs Robert Jolley / Michael Shinn6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris Cox / Jeff Ganaden vs David Bird / Skip Johnson6-0, 6-1
2021-06-13vs Smith, JohnWon 30
W#1 DoublesR Scott Hanover / Jeff Ganaden vs Gadi Bramson / Barry Waldron6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesVernon Shand / Lanny Wake vs Stuart Carrico / Bond Marrs7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrad Harding / Wayne McKamie vs John Smith / Brian Burton6-4, 6-4
2021-06-06vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesJan Claussen / Jeff Ganaden vs Jeffrey Spivak / Doug Wright4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrad Harding / Gregory Russell vs Kenneth Havens / Henry Arst6-7, 4-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Cox / Chuck Raplinger vs Kris Chatrathi / Fen Wang6-0, 7-5
2021-05-23vs Bird, DavidWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Cox / Jack Bastable vs Stan Chappell / Jeff Harbin6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Jeff Ganaden vs Mark Blakley / Michael Shinn6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWayne McKamie / Gregory Russell vs Robert Jolley / Gary Merrill6-3, 6-4
2021-05-16vs Smith, JohnWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Harding / Chuck Raplinger vs Jeffrey Marcott / Barry Waldron6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Hiebert / Gregory Russell vs Stuart Carrico / Bond Marrs7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJan Claussen / R Scott Hanover vs Brian Burton / John Smith6-4, 6-2
2021-05-02vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesWayne McKamie / Lanny Wake vs Jeffrey Spivak / Doug Wright4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Cox / Chuck Raplinger vs John Burdolski / Kris Chatrathi6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Ganaden / Brad Harding vs Kevin Harlan / Kenneth Havens6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-25vs Bird, DavidWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Cox / Michael Hiebert vs Peter Lazar / Michael Shinn6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Jeff Ganaden vs Robert Jolley / Neal Farnsworth6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrad Harding / Gregory Russell vs Gary Merrill / Mark Ruggles6-0, 6-3
2021-04-18vs Smith, JohnWon 30
W#1 DoublesWayne McKamie / Gregory Russell vs Brian Burton / Nathan Granger6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Cox / Michael Hiebert vs Ravi Bhagat / Barry Waldron6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVernon Shand / Lanny Wake vs Bond Marrs / John Smith6-2, 6-0
2021-04-11vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Cox / Michael Hiebert vs John Burdolski / Kris Chatrathi6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJan Claussen / Jeff Ganaden vs Jeffrey Spivak / Doug Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Harding / Lanny Wake vs Gib Benschoter / Gregory Mott6-0, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0M8121614183
2HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0M6318923231
3Smith, John2791840299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Jan Claussen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Chris Cox
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Jeff Ganaden
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.63
Gregory Russell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Brad Harding
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.53
Chuck Raplinger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lanny Wake
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Michael Hiebert
published
R Scott Hanover
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vernon Shand
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Wayne McKamie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Ganaden + Jan Claussen91248% games−0.6% vs expected
Chuck Raplinger + Chris Cox5258% gamesnot enough data
Wayne McKamie + Brad Harding2338% gamesnot enough data
Wayne McKamie + Gregory Russell3259% gamesnot enough data
Vernon Shand + Lanny Wake303 matchesnot enough data
Jan Claussen + R Scott Hanover213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jan Claussen
91W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chris Cox
40W–14L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Ganaden
118W–94L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Gregory Russell
24W–13L career · 5 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Brad Harding
88W–108L career · 6 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Chuck Raplinger
37W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Lanny Wake
24W–23L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Hiebert
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
R Scott Hanover
30W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vernon Shand
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wayne McKamie
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.