BHSC - Hill

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings3 teams · Charlottesville Singles 3.5 Women

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1ACAC - Jones - Love All Ladies	0	0	0	0	0	0
2Tonsler - Fletcher - Sweets Gone Wild	0	0	0	0	0	0
3BHSC - Hill	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41

Stephanie Radlick

usually #1 Singles 100% · published —

3.36

Emilyann Steinbach

usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5

3.27

Christina Nicholaou

published 3.5

3.23

Kelsy Hill

published 3.5

3.22

Courtney Heyward

published 3.5

3.11

Anita McGinty

usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5

3.10

Rachel Swartz

published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Stephanie Radlick

7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.41

3.5

Emilyann Steinbach

7W–2L career · type D · 1 line in 2026

<1%86%13%

3.36

3.5

Christina Nicholaou

10W–4L career · no lines in 2026

2%94%4%

3.27

3.5

Kelsy Hill

103W–117L career · no lines in 2026

4%94%2%

3.23

3.5

Courtney Heyward

13W–10L career · no lines in 2026

5%94%2%

3.22

3.5

Anita McGinty

73W–56L career · 1 line in 2026

20%80%<1%

3.11

—

Rachel Swartz

2W–3L career · no lines in 2026

22%78%<1%

3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.