Teams

MTC - McNeil

2025 Adult 18 & Over Women Fall Night - Mobile · 3.0 Women Night 18+

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Catherine McGowin
published 3.5
2.98
2.86
Anna Alexander
published 3
2.79
Jane Barnett
published
2.78
Courtney Nix
published 3
2.68
Betsy White
published 3
2.67
Lacy Mulroy
published
2.65
Ally Smith
published 3
2.62
Katherine Mcneil
published
2.61
Collin McConnell
published 3
2.38
Allison Garstecki
published 2.5
2.27
Frances Williams
published
2.15
Katelyn Parnell
published
Elizabeth Otts
published
Jamie Conger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ally Smith + Anna Alexander5547% games+6.3% vs expected
Katherine Mcneil + Betsy White3251% games+3.8% vs expected
Katherine Mcneil + Lacy Mulroy134 matchesnot enough data
Collin McConnell + Ally Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine McGowin
26W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3
Alison Hieronymus
23W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Anna Alexander
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Jane Barnett
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Courtney Nix
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Betsy White
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lacy Mulroy
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Ally Smith
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Katherine Mcneil
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Collin McConnell
10W–21L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Allison Garstecki
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Frances Williams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Katelyn Parnell
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Elizabeth Otts
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Conger
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.