Teams

Parks/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-18vs Adams/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Jorgensen / Anna Parker vs Stefanie Adams / Stacy McIntosh3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLea Parks / Brook Park vs Kristi Barber / Michelle Sills6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrooke Thurman / Jennifer Cook vs Rhonda Mann / Ginger Cunningham6-3, 7-5
2026-04-27vs Penn-Thackston/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLea Parks / Jennifer Cook vs Julia Connor / Karen Koester2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Thurman / Ashley Hoskins vs Leslie Lischer / Amanda Miles6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Jorgensen / Janet Morgan vs Shannon Thackston / Elizabeth Justus1-6, 0-6
2026-04-20vs Bell-Palacios/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristen Overbay / Katherine Michalik vs Pomy Lewis / Maggie Reynolds6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAshley Hoskins vs Ashley Reed5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLea Parks / Jennifer Cook vs Megan Parker / Anne Marie Rasmussen6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAshli Christen / Brooke Thurman vs Joanne Latimer / Mary Bailey Oakes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-13vs Adams/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesGeri Landry / Jennifer Cook vs Susan Payne / Ginger Cunningham6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLea Parks / Ashley Hoskins vs Leigh M Krieps / Michelle Sills7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Jorgensen / Brook Park vs Olga Sokolov / Rhonda Mann6-1, 7-6
W#4 DoublesBrooke Thurman / Krista McIntosh vs Chasity O'Quinn / Whitney Davis6-1, 6-2
2026-04-06vs Gill-McGinnis/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeri Landry / Jennifer Cook vs Michelle Russ / Darcy Hoffman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLea Parks / Brook Park vs Suzanne Carswell / Amy McCleary4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Overbay / Jessica Jorgensen vs Caroline McGinnis / Joy Ruble6-3, 6-3
2026-03-23vs Penn-Thackston/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKatherine Michalik / Imke Burfeind vs Julia Connor / Elizabeth Justus6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Hoskins vs Sherry Byington3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cook / Ashli Christen vs Lisa Smith / Rachel Waddell3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJen Rose / Krista McIntosh vs Shannon Thackston / Kayla O'Connor1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesGeri Landry / Brook Park vs Amy Penn / Stephanie Bonovich5-7, 6-7
2026-03-20vs Bell-Palacios/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesImke Burfeind / Katherine Michalik vs Karen Bell / Anne Marie Rasmussen6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristen Overbay vs Michelle Corley6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica Jorgensen / Brooke Thurman vs Meka Barry / Pomy Lewis3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGeri Landry / Ashley Hoskins vs Ashley Reed / Jennifer McLaughlin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesAshli Christen / Jen Rose vs Rose Perkinson / Megan Parker6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Imke Burfeind
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Katherine Michalik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Lea Parks
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Jessica Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Kristen Overbay
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Ashli Christen
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Jen Rose
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Brook Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Brooke Thurman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Ashley Hoskins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.52
Geri Landry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Janet Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashli Christen + Geri Landry4548% games−12.5% vs expected
Katherine Michalik + Imke Burfeind4163% gamesnot enough data
Imke Burfeind + Brook Park4162% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Thurman + Ashli Christen224 matchesnot enough data
Ashli Christen + Jen Rose224 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Hoskins + Kristen Overbay314 matchesnot enough data
Lea Parks + Ashley Hoskins213 matchesnot enough data
Lea Parks + Brook Park213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Imke Burfeind
35W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Katherine Michalik
41W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lea Parks
32W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Jessica Jorgensen
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kristen Overbay
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Ashli Christen
19W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Jen Rose
50W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Brook Park
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Brooke Thurman
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Ashley Hoskins
25W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Geri Landry
35W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.52
Janet Morgan
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.