Teams

Hawkins/SH

2021 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 7.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-08vs Gulledge/ISWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Champagne / MIKE MEARS vs John Butts Jr / Duane Mathias6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryan Hawkins / Keith Henley vs D G / Rusty Peterson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Wollmershauser / Charles Wollmershauser vs Rick Bogard / Charlie Fowler6-2, 6-2
2021-04-29vs Ragan/RH91Won 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Champagne / MIKE MEARS vs Bill Drotar / Brian Leonard4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPreston Phillips / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Chris Ferris / Glenn Lafitte6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Henley / Bryan Hawkins vs Herbert Elias / Ronald Hall6-3, 6-3
2021-04-07vs Long 55s/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Coulson / Preston Phillips vs Thomas Lydy / Timothy O'Brien6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Champagne / MIKE MEARS vs John Lieber / Douglas Phillips4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarin Berryhill / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Tony Jezek / Kevin Maloney5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-04-03vs Gulledge/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynnwood Moore / Jeff Hassell vs Tim Trump / Duane Mathias1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Hawkins / Keith Henley vs Rusty Peterson / D G6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLloyd Prueitt / Preston Phillips vs Curt Carmichael / Charlie Fowler6-4, 7-5
2021-03-27vs Langwell/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Wollmershauser / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Steven Dollmann / Tuck Curren3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLloyd Prueitt / Jeff Hassell vs Bret McGuire / Alan Clark1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesScott Coulson / Darin Berryhill vs John Buchan / Kevin Thomas6-3, 6-3
2021-03-20vs Heatherington 7.0/LFSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMIKE MEARS / Michael Champagne vs Monty Musgrove / Jasen Texeira4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLloyd Prueitt / Darin Berryhill vs Thomas E Norton / Boris Pallares2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-13vs Ragan/RH91Lost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Coulson / MIKE MEARS vs Bill Drotar / Brian Leonard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBryan Hawkins / Lloyd Prueitt vs Gary Owsiany / Jed Rice3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Bailey / Lynnwood Moore vs Kenneth Ragan / Chris Ferris3-6, 2-6
2021-03-06vs MOValley/Cohlmia/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesLloyd Prueitt / Keith Henley vs Steven Henry / Brett Williams0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMIKE MEARS / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Jay Gulick / Thomas Gillock2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Bailey / Charles Wollmershauser vs Steven Bradley / David Wallis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Cohlmia/55&Over7.0M902619158
2Long 55s/LF54141331241
3Langwell/LF54141332256
4Hawkins/SH44131128239
5Ragan/RH913591531220
6Heatherington 7.0/LF3672043279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Matthew Wollmershauser
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Keith Henley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Darin Berryhill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Charles Wollmershauser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeff Hassell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lloyd Prueitt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lynnwood Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
MIKE MEARS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Champagne
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Scott Coulson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Coulson + Matthew Wollmershauser6947% games+0.7% vs expected
Matthew Wollmershauser + Charles Wollmershauser6456% gamesnot enough data
MIKE MEARS + Michael Champagne6259% gamesnot enough data
Lloyd Prueitt + Jeff Hassell044 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Wollmershauser + Keith Henley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Wollmershauser
97W–111L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.37
Keith Henley
63W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Darin Berryhill
105W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Charles Wollmershauser
57W–89L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
Jeff Hassell
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lloyd Prueitt
20W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lynnwood Moore
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
MIKE MEARS
20W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Champagne
28W–14L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Coulson
31W–28L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.