Teams

LCTA18/Sutterlin/DIC

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 4.0 - Day

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-03-26vs LCTA18/Lanphear/LTP-DILost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Jones / Heather Thompson vs Lauren Goulette / Erin Massey6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-23vs LCTA18/Zetrouer/MPRWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Randall / Heather Thompson vs Susan Schnorr / Linda Costello4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-02-23vs LCTA18/Gentile/DWWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Thompson / Karen Bright vs Debbie Michael / Jennifer Rickell5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 4.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Ann Harrah
published 4.5
3.86
Jennifer Noone
published
3.77
Lisa Keller
published
3.74
Kathy Roberts
published
3.73
Christa Struk
published 4
3.72
Karen Bright
published
3.71
Kerrie Scott
published
3.68
Jennifer Greeno
published
3.64
Heather Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Erin Randall
published 4
Jana Estes
published
Kelly Rose
published
Kendell Sutterlin
published
Kimberly Arthurs
published
Leslie Leaf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Struk + Jennifer Noone5262% games+13.9% vs expected
Jennifer Noone + Lisa Keller7254% games+6.4% vs expected
Christa Struk + Lisa Keller6252% games+4.1% vs expected
Lisa Keller + Kelly Rose6255% games+1.2% vs expected
Kerrie Scott + Christa Struk4456% games−1.3% vs expected
Jennifer Greeno + Jennifer Noone5254% games−2.2% vs expected
Kendell Sutterlin + Karen Bright224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Bright + Kathy Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Harrah
40W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Jennifer Noone
51W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Lisa Keller
42W–29L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Kathy Roberts
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Christa Struk
45W–24L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Karen Bright
33W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Kerrie Scott
26W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Jennifer Greeno
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Heather Thompson
126W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Erin Randall
29W–28L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
Jana Estes
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Rose
20W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kendell Sutterlin
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Arthurs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Leaf
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.