Teams

Legrand/40/7.5/CM/Caps

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
Oct 7 6:30 PM
vs N/A
William LegrandKeith Jarrell
Oct 14 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
2026-08-26vs Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesYeon Lee / Rick Burnett vs Javier Jacome / Greg Dadlez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShakeeb Shariff / Bryan Hale vs Jourdan Generes / Lance McCardle2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTony Paternostro / Tim Kern vs Michael Madere / Nick Dobson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
2Legrand/40/7.5/CM/Caps000000
3Walker/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
4Costello/40/7.5/CM/MCC000000
5Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryan Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Yeon Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
J Landry
published
3.28
Rick Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Tony Paternostro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Steven Schmitt
published
3.24
Keith Jarrell
published
3.20
William Legrand
published
2.96
James Leslie
published
2.95
Shakeeb Shariff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Koontz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Burnett + Steven Schmitt4159% gamesnot enough data
James Leslie + William Legrand033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Hale
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yeon Lee
11W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
J Landry
11W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Rick Burnett
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Tony Paternostro
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Steven Schmitt
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Keith Jarrell
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
William Legrand
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
James Leslie
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Shakeeb Shariff
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Matthew Koontz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.