← Teams

THPRD-Lee/Blebea

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
NANDA SIDDAIAH
published 4
3.81
Agus Rusli
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Harish Krishnamurthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Angie Urrutia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Abhijit Phakatkar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Manoj Pandya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Heberlein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-12-08Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Edmund Yuan vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Kyle McGovern6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Manoj Pandya vs Rohit Mathew / Sharon Mathew6-3, 6-4
2024-11-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLauren Smith / Agus Rusli vs HOLLY LIBERATORE / Huy Bui7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJamie Heberlein / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Ann Arp / Alex McIntosh6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVivian Nguyen / James Lawrence vs Maya Mori / Peter Singson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAbhijit Phakatkar / Angie Urrutia vs Tami Socolofsky / Chris Brecke7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Lauren Smith vs Victoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJamie Heberlein / Agus Rusli vs Lisa Kearns / Bill Eisen Amurao6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Edmund Yuan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-12Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLauren Smith / Agus Rusli vs Nicole Norby / Kevin Heller6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Urrutia / Harish Krishnamurthy vs Tarynn Berkman / Tuan Phan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Heberlein / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Barbara Dusicka / Henry Vu6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAngie Urrutia / James Lawrence vs Owen Chu / Monica Nguyen6-7, 6-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Lee / Manoj Pandya vs Brandon Kirlin / Aleina Tanabe6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Chloe Becker Daraee / Kyahn Daraee3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAngie Urrutia / Harish Krishnamurthy vs Rachel Ritchie / Dan de Leon6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Jamie Heberlein vs Erin Casey / Nathan Klipp6-3, 6-2
2024-09-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Abhijit Phakatkar vs Laurence Dupray / Marc Zimmerman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngie Lee / Manoj Pandya vs Ruta Golovnykh / Mikhail Golovnykh6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Rita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–31L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.81
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
3.5
Harish Krishnamurthy
58W–34L career
1%89%10%
3.37
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Angie Urrutia
73W–39L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Abhijit Phakatkar
3W–2L career · type S
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Manoj Pandya
121W–62L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Jamie Heberlein
45W–47L career
31%68%1%
3.05
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.