Teams

BTC:Game, Set, Laugh:Wimble

Summer Social Flex League · Women's 7.0 Summer Flex

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-16vs BTC:Hit For Brains:WeissLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Pinard / Arlene Abadi vs Kim McManus / Vivianne Ivanier3-8
2026-08-09vs BTC:Serve-vivorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Abadi / Edye Graning vs Martha Edelson / Peggy Cohen8-3
2026-08-02vs BTC:Hit For Brains:WeissWon 20
W#1 DoublesArlene Abadi / DeShan Foret vs Kim McManus / Megan OBrien8-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Pecora / Olivia Schneider vs Kate Cunningham / Kristin Walsh8-4
2026-07-12vs BTC:Serve-vivorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Wimble / Gini Park vs Lori Roberts / Martha Edelson9-7
W#2 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Edye Graning vs Lori Durieux / Alana Lowry8-6
2026-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Judith Wimble vs Mina Smith / Rebecca Stevens9-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women's 7.0 Summer Flex
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Game, Set, Laugh:Wimble51102248
2BTC:Serve-vivors4257776
3BTC:Hit For Brains:Weiss3384456
4BTC:Alley Cats:Fonseca061111197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Olivia Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Judith Wimble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Mary Beth Pinard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
DeShan Foret
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Edye Graning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Arlene Abadi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Gini Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Emily Pecora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Megan Shrestha
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Schneider
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Judith Wimble
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Mary Beth Pinard
41W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
DeShan Foret
7W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Edye Graning
37W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Arlene Abadi
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Gini Park
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Emily Pecora
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Megan Shrestha
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.