Teams

Wyoming/Bridgmon/40&Over3.0W

2023 USTA 40 & OVER · Ladies 3.0 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-08vs Lika 40+ Team TwoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudi Hulme / Shirley Moore vs Kristiana Hansen / Annie Bergman6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaurie Hill vs PAULINE DUNNUCK6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTreasure McPherson / Penny Wiseman vs Carol Adams / Christel Walrath6-1, 6-2
2023-08-03vs Lika 40+ Team TwoWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarian Grandbois / Angelika Bridgmon vs PAULINE DUNNUCK / Carol Adams6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJudi Hulme vs Kristiana Hansen6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPenny Wiseman / Laurie Hill vs Christel Walrath / Christine Mottl6-3, 6-1
2023-08-01vs Lika 40+ Team TwoLost 12
W#1 DoublesShirley Moore / Angelika Bridgmon vs Kristiana Hansen / PAULINE DUNNUCK6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTreasure McPherson vs Christel Walrath4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJudi Hulme / Marian Grandbois vs Carol Adams / Annie Bergman3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Bridgmon/40&Over3.0W30102451
2Lika 40+ Team Two0321020140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Penny Wiseman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Shirley Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Treasure McPherson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Laurie Hill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Angelika Bridgmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Judi Hulme
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Marian Grandbois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Moore + Penny Wiseman303 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Moore + Angelika Bridgmon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Wiseman
30W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
Shirley Moore
53W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Treasure McPherson
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
Laurie Hill
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.63
3
Angelika Bridgmon
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
Judi Hulme
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marian Grandbois
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.