Teams

MC RED

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs MC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesGlen Todd / John Truchel vs Pawel Mankowski / Cj Colburn2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Alexander Morawski6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJerry Neff / Tim Robins vs Humberto Preciado / John Henry0-6, 3-6
2026-08-19vs BM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Glen Todd vs Andrew Green / Ryan Heffernan6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs John Brittan6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBarry Mendeloff / Tim Robins vs Richard Lorentz / Rusty Watson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-05vs LEBTC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / John Truchel vs Arin Neucks / Alexander Page2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Peter Fischer6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Martin / Jerry Neff vs Paul Tilly / Jake Hall1-6, 2-6
2026-07-29vs KC-CC YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Martin / Glen Todd vs Gordon Robertson / James Baraglia6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Matt Westbrook4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBarry Mendeloff / Tim Robins vs Brett Vladika / Steven Dick3-6, 4-6
2026-07-22vs SS-LGT BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Glen Todd vs Rick Blankenship / Vincent Gonzales7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Jacob Shelver7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarry Mendeloff / Jerry Neff vs Mark Benson / DAVID LUNDGREN2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Glen Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Bryan Racz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
John Truchel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Patrick Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Rom van der Zee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Barry Mendeloff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Tim Robins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jerry Neff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Todd + Rom van der Zee6065% games+11.2% vs expected
Jerry Neff + Rom van der Zee2641% games−2.9% vs expected
Tim Robins + Barry Mendeloff224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Glen Todd
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Bryan Racz
34W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
John Truchel
65W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Patrick Martin
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Rom van der Zee
70W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Barry Mendeloff
18W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Tim Robins
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jerry Neff
12W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.