Teams

YOLO Challengers

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-09-14vs Happy FeetLost 02
L#1 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Caitlin Bergo3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Courtney McDonald2-6, 2-6
2024-08-25vs DC Tennis ClubLost 02
L#1 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Kaitlin Bell2-6, 4-4
L#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Nicole Hanson5-7, 3-1
2024-08-24vs PINEY RUNLost 02
L#1 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs LaMia Jones5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Penelope Wilson2-6, 4-4
2024-08-17vs NETworkLost 01
L#2 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Sabrina Altema2-6, 5-4
2024-08-11vs 3.0 Killer BeesLost 01
L#2 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Alexis Aafedt2-6, 1-6
2024-08-10vs Court JestersLost 02
L#2 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Marissa Schmauch Womble5-6
L#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Danielle Tiley0-6, 4-6
2024-08-03vs DC Tennis ClubSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Angela Sharma2-6, 5-4
L#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Meredith Healy0-6, 1-6
2024-07-28vs PINEY RUNLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Socheata Kim6-4, 0-3
2024-07-27vs Happy FeetWon 20
W#2 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Patricia Prince6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-21vs NETworkLost 01
L#1 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Jasmine Beasley1-6, 1-6
2024-07-13vs 3.0 Killer BeesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Emily McHarg2-6, 3-3
W#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Mominah Farrukh6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-07vs Court JestersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSailata Katragadda vs Mikaela Seligman4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDeborah Wright vs Danielle Tiley3-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Happy Feet012191733258
23.0 Killer Bees012181835286
3Court Jesters012171936283
4YOLO Challengers01292750344

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Sailata Katragadda
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.77
Caitlin Hamill
published 3
Deborah Wright
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Jasmine Miles
usually #3 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.44
Nicola Lwin
published
Thaddisa Fulwood
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sailata Katragadda
35W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Caitlin Hamill
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Deborah Wright
2W–17L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jasmine Miles
43W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Nicola Lwin
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Thaddisa Fulwood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.