Teams

Rockledge -Hartnett

2022 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-03vs Fee - BadrakWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Luiz Traversin vs James Rothe / Anthony Melusky6-2, 6-0
2022-08-01vs Kiwi -DulayLost 01
L#2 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Luiz Traversin vs Greg Rieder / Martin Rojas6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-20vs Brevard - TTC/FloresLost 01
L#3 DoublesNorman Hosan / Nathan Hartnett vs Daniel Flores / Eddie White4-6, 4-6
2022-07-13vs Fee - BadrakWon 10
W#3 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Nathan Hartnett vs Todd Croy / Carl Acquaviva7-6, 6-4
2022-07-06vs Kiwi -DulayLost 01
L#1 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Tareque Liaquat vs Doug Young / Michael Carpenter4-6, 2-6
2022-06-29vs Brevard - TTC/FloresLost 02
L#1 DoublesNorman Hosan / Gregory Whitaker vs Daniel Evans / Andy McConnell2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Terry Lane vs Jacob Kargauer / Elliott Hogans2-6, 4-6
2022-06-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesNorman Hosan / Nathan Hartnett vs Adam Cangiano / Anthony Melusky6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-17vs Brevard - TTC/FloresLost 01
L#1 DoublesNorman Hosan / Luiz Traversin vs Daniel Evans / Eddie White2-6, 4-6
2022-06-15vs Kiwi -DulayWon 20
W#1 DoublesNorman Hosan / Tareque Liaquat vs Michael Carpenter / Long Dang6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDouglas Nelson / Gregory Whitaker vs Benjamin Smith / Ron Dulay7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Nathan Hartnett
published
3.88
Luiz Traversin
published
3.84
Elliott Hulscher
published 4
3.79
Douglas Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
James Hartnett
published 4
3.76
Terry Lane
published
3.67
Norman Hosan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.43
Tareque Liaquat
published
3.33
John Donovan
published
3.25
Jay Amburgey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Donovan + Jay Amburgey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Hartnett
21W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Luiz Traversin
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Elliott Hulscher
89W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Douglas Nelson
36W–34L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
James Hartnett
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Terry Lane
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Norman Hosan
98W–112L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Tareque Liaquat
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
John Donovan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Jay Amburgey
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.