Teams

Lair/LR/Rebs

2025 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-08vs Bennett/Worley/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Lair / John Ramsay vs Paul Kroger / Jason Bennett5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Hankins / Mike Wisinger vs Bobby Perry / Mark McGetrick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngelo Volpi / Christopher Stewart vs Pete Owens / Stan Belue6-3, 6-2
2025-08-25vs DGarretson/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Anderson / Jeff Hankins vs Benjamin Rider / Jon Callahan6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCraig Lair / Rob Christian vs Joshua de la Cruz / Hitesh Patel6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Clark Cogbill vs Santosh Arekar / Steven Ransdell6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jeff Hankins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
David Pate
published 3.5
3.43
John Ramsay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Angelo Volpi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Clark Cogbill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Polk
published
3.17
Rob Christian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Edward Angtuaco
published
3.02
Greg Engstrom
published
3.02
Craig Lair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Mike Wisinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Lair + Clark Cogbill3352% games+6.7% vs expected
Rob Christian + Clark Cogbill224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hankins + Scott Polk213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Hankins
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
David Pate
25W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
John Ramsay
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Angelo Volpi
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Clark Cogbill
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Scott Polk
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Rob Christian
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Edward Angtuaco
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Greg Engstrom
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Craig Lair
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Mike Wisinger
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christopher Stewart
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.