Teams

Refunds

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · Refunds

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Diane Hargett
published 4.5
3.97
Jean Salisbury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Oren Golanski
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Tiffany Hurrell
published
3.41
Jeff Cohen
published
3.21
Daniel Malecki
published 3.5
3.08
Trey Farley
published 3.5
2.86
Erica Turkus
published 3
2.79
Sophie Karsch
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane Hargett
31W–23L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.20
Jean Salisbury
7W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Oren Golanski
219W–55L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Tiffany Hurrell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Jeff Cohen
23W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Daniel Malecki
39W–64L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Trey Farley
22W–67L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Erica Turkus
74W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Sophie Karsch
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.