Teams

CROW CANYON CC CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

27 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
KIM HOLLAND
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Romeda Arsanjani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Tine Ankersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Linda Wu
published
2.89
Chesica Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Judy Schmulewicz
published
2.76
Maureen Peer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Belt
published 3
2.75
Colleen McClure
published 3
2.75
Fida Musallam
published 3
2.73
2.69
Cheryl Moore
published 3
2.62
Kelly Kaplan
published
2.60
Barbara Beckley
published 3
2.52
Naghmeh Nouri
published
2.44
Cami Bebarta
published 3
2.44
Yvonne Deir
published
2.41
Myla Bush
published
2.40
Rose Toy
published
2.22
Susan Chai
published
2.15
Donna Sbarra
published 2.5
1.85
Anita Roth
published 2.5
Jessica Ford
published
Lauren Venema
published
Lizette Kyman
published
Myriam Nunez
published
Shirley Xue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KIM HOLLAND + Tine Ankersen4159% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Deir + Donna Sbarra224 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Beckley + Colleen McClure123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Romeda Arsanjani
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Tine Ankersen
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Linda Wu
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Chesica Hall
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Judy Schmulewicz
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Maureen Peer
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Anne Belt
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Colleen McClure
2W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Fida Musallam
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jackelyne Ferreira
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cheryl Moore
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Kelly Kaplan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.62
3
Barbara Beckley
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Naghmeh Nouri
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
3
Cami Bebarta
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
Yvonne Deir
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.44
Myla Bush
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.41
Rose Toy
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Susan Chai
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Donna Sbarra
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Anita Roth
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Jessica Ford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Venema
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizette Kyman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Myriam Nunez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Xue
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.