Teams

Kuerbis/Harrington-Rain Delay

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brooke Kuerbis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Teresa Chan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Lucia Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Monica Conners
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Monica Conners vs Christy Locke / Marcella Barta6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLucia Parker / Laurel Hallock Koppelman vs Deborah Self / Cynthia Escamilla3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Monica Conners vs Jaime Hamilton / Martha Tolentino6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Teresa Chan vs Barbara Gram / Margo Yohner7-5, 6-3
2025-07-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Teresa Chan vs Kelley Malama / Kristin Morris6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Conners / Lucia Parker vs Yone Akagi / Lauren Kinderknecht6-0, 6-2
2025-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Kuerbis / Lucia Parker vs Alexis Nelson Knapp / Valerie Neill6-4, 5-4
2025-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Emily Harrington vs Deanna Williams / Andrea Sanchez6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brooke Kuerbis
94W–31L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Teresa Chan
61W–20L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3
Lucia Parker
50W–35L career
0%63%37%
3.07
3
Monica Conners
34W–9L career
0%64%36%
3.06
3
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
74W–75L career
0%97%3%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.