Teams

KY/LEX/Ernst-Simonsen 4.0

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-05vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 05
L#1 DoublesYvonne Conner / Monica Mullins vs Camille Morrow / Lily Le0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Katie Parrish1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine McDoniel / Angie Cobb vs Lindsey Kretz / Pat Miller3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarlyn Moore / Stephanie Queen vs Christy Herring / Jill Leckner1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMeghan Simonsen / Sarah Hancock vs Sarah Delahanty / Catherine Richmond3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs KY/LEX/MolinaLost 23
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ernst / Catherine McDoniel vs Cindy Bramble / Mary Jouet6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Melinda Shofner6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Heather Thompson vs Lori Brunner / Jennifer Janes4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Conner / Meghan Simonsen vs Lisa Castle / Leslie Russ5-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesRia Voth / Monica Mestanza vs Billie Walters / Jennifer Wilson1-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnn Boone / Amy Worthington Johnson vs Lily Le / Jill Leckner1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Katie Parrish3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison George / Olive Gallagher vs Camille Morrow / Malissa McAlister0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Conner / Tanya Johnson vs Catherine Richmond / Jennifer Alexander1-6, 2-6
2025-01-03vs KY/LEX/MolinaLost 04
L#1 DoublesCatherine McDoniel / Ann Boone vs Leslie Russ / Lisa Castle1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Worthington Johnson / Carlyn Moore vs Mary Jouet / Hiroko Nakata2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaria del Mar Landron / Tanya Johnson vs Melinda Shofner / Jennifer Janes3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesRia Voth / Stephanie Queen vs Whitney Byard / Doris Senters2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Ann Boone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Catherine McDoniel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Sarah Stykes
published
3.35
Maria del Mar Landron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Rose Knight
published
3.27
Monica Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Amy Worthington Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Meghan Simonsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Yvonne Conner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Lisa Price
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Carlyn Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Queen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Angie Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Ria Voth
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Knight + Stephanie Queen2451% games+2.6% vs expected
Maria del Mar Landron + Meghan Simonsen1742% games−5.9% vs expected
Meghan Simonsen + Yvonne Conner033 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Conner + Olive Gallagher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Boone
32W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Catherine McDoniel
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Sarah Stykes
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Maria del Mar Landron
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Rose Knight
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Monica Mullins
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Meghan Simonsen
12W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Lisa Price
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Carlyn Moore
12W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Queen
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Angie Cobb
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Tanya Johnson
6W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
Ria Voth
6W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.