Teams

SGV Smashing Divas 3.5- De los Santos- WN/SU10

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#3 DoublesFaith Yeaton / Joanne Yoshida vs Sanja Morris / Stephanie Smith2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGloria Cardoza / Maribeth F Rodriguez vs Barbara Kelly / Johanna Baumann1-6, 2-6
2021-10-30vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SA10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFaith Yeaton / Laura Stover vs Cynthia Garcia / Gloria Nuguid0-6, 2-6
2021-10-24vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SA10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia McNulty / Joanne Yoshida vs Mercedes Soriano / Gloria Nuguid1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaribeth F Rodriguez / Debbie Carmody vs Antoinette Lessuk / Suzie Sarkisian1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia McNulty / Lan Chao vs Amber Nuuvali / Laurel Eriksen1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesIrma Martinez / Faith Yeaton vs Pei Fu / Virginia Takeuchi1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaribeth F Rodriguez / Debbie Carmody vs Sandra Zane / Ronalyn Raymundo0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Lan Chao
published
3.42
Debbie Carmody
published 3.5
3.09
Hae Oh
published 3.5
2.93
Joanne Yoshida
published
2.89
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.86
Patricia McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Gloria Cardoza
published 3
2.50
Faith Yeaton
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Irma Martinez
published 3
Laura Stover
published
Linda Matsumoto
published
Margarita Frame
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faith Yeaton + Patricia McNulty4746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lan Chao
23W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Debbie Carmody
18W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Hae Oh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Joanne Yoshida
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 11 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Patricia McNulty
74W–109L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Gloria Cardoza
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Faith Yeaton
27W–57L career · 8 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Irma Martinez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.47
Laura Stover
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Matsumoto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margarita Frame
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.