Teams

BERKELEY TC 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Kendall Riding
published
3.14
Jenan Abdunnur
published
2.97
Hiromi Takekuma
published
2.92
Jill Foley
published
2.91
Jann King
published
2.90
Gabriela Aranda
published
2.87
Rebecca Abrams
published
2.83
Irina Wolf Carriere
published
2.81
Michelle Marshank
published
2.62
Joanna Katz
published
2.60
Wendy Abshez
published
2.57
2.40
Adrian Hill
published 2.5
Jane Hammond
published
Melissa Nelken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Aranda + Michelle Marshank224 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Aranda + Jill Foley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Riding
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Jenan Abdunnur
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Hiromi Takekuma
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jill Foley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jann King
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
Gabriela Aranda
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Rebecca Abrams
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Irina Wolf Carriere
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Michelle Marshank
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Joanna Katz
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Wendy Abshez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Bernadette Joseph
1W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Adrian Hill
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
Jane Hammond
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Nelken
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.