Teams

Peak Unruh-Burgeson

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 4.0 WOMEN Spokane

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs SRC Dream TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshlie Unruh / Ansley Bolme vs Whitney Jones / Amber McCombs5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCinthia Campos vs Valerie Rubright6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYuying Johnson / Laura Burgeson vs Kiersten Shelby / Cathy Crowson1-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs EW-PFC-SpitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshlie Unruh / Ansley Bolme vs Hayley Scroop / Hannah Deubel0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAbby Gardner vs Marianne Thompson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCinthia Campos vs Olivia Erland4-6, 4-6
2025-03-08vs SRC Dream TeamSplit 22
L#1 SinglesLaura Burgeson vs Linnea Love3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshlie Unruh / Ansley Bolme vs Elizabeth Killian / Kiersten Shelby6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAbby Gardner vs Valerie Rubright6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Carlsen / Nichole Shanley vs Julene Osborn / Whitney Jones6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs EW-PFC-SpitzLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnsley Bolme / Valerie Garcia vs Alyssa Fitzgerald / Caitlin Hicks4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Burgeson vs Marianne Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCinthia Campos vs Olivia Erland3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Owen / Yuying Johnson vs Miki Peck / Kimberly Bayley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-02vs SRC Dream TeamLost 12
L#1 SinglesLaura Burgeson vs Valerie Rubright6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshlie Unruh / Yuying Johnson vs Amber McCombs / Whitney Jones5-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAnsley Bolme vs Elizabeth Killian6-3, 6-3
2025-01-25vs EW-PFC-SpitzLost 04
L#1 SinglesLaura Burgeson vs Marianne Thompson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Carlsen / Nichole Shanley vs Tiffany Sauer / Kimberly Bayley4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna-Kate Levesque vs Jessica Sherman5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYuying Johnson / Wendy Teets vs Kelli Geris / Giang Bui2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 WOMEN Spokane
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PFC-Spitz6024617207
2SRC Dream Team33151535270
3Peak Unruh-Burgeson0662450323

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Wendy Teets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Denise Mai
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Anna-Kate Levesque
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Ansley Bolme
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Cinthia Campos
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Ashlie Unruh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Valerie Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Abby Gardner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Laura Burgeson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Collette Jarvelin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Nichole Shanley
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Janet Owen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tracy Carlsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Yuying Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Carlsen + Nichole Shanley6252% games+13.2% vs expected
Wendy Teets + Denise Mai13363% games+9.2% vs expected
Ashlie Unruh + Valerie Garcia5161% games+6.8% vs expected
Wendy Teets + Ashlie Unruh4257% games+2.7% vs expected
Ansley Bolme + Valerie Garcia0638% games−2.4% vs expected
Denise Mai + Valerie Garcia192048% games−4.2% vs expected
Janet Owen + Valerie Garcia2643% games−5.5% vs expected
Ashlie Unruh + Ansley Bolme2439% games−12.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Teets
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Denise Mai
42W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Anna-Kate Levesque
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Ansley Bolme
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cinthia Campos
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ashlie Unruh
41W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Valerie Garcia
44W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Abby Gardner
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.59
Laura Burgeson
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Collette Jarvelin
17W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Nichole Shanley
21W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Janet Owen
27W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.19
Tracy Carlsen
12W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuying Johnson
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.