Teams

Golden Racquettes

2024 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 6.0 Tuesday Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-19vs Sonterra SolLost 03
L#1 DoublesDee Lorkovic / Renee Weatherford vs Cindy Berman / Elsa Ang0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Owens / Kathy Hogan vs Tracy Gilmer / Lisa Koxlien3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Kosta / Lynne Aranda vs Ruth Bates / Kim Griffin6-7, 2-6
2024-11-05vs TBM - HOALost 12
L#1 DoublesMonica Kosta / Renee Weatherford vs Gail Collamore / Cindy Linville5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Owens / Huong Edmondson vs Janis Wommack / Susan Erhardt6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynne Aranda / Susana Trevino vs Pam Colvin / Kimberly Weldon1-6, 1-6
2024-10-15vs Sonterra SolLost 12
L#1 DoublesHuong Edmondson / Monica Kosta vs Tracy Gilmer / Denise Jones2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDee Lorkovic / Jackie Kemp vs Lisa Koxlien / Lisa Womack2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Owens / Myrtha Horton vs Lenora Wulfe / Yvette Schycker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-01vs TBM - HOALost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Kosta / Deborah Owens vs Susan Erhardt / Denise Barrett1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Hogan / Ann Ross vs Jan Keen / Marilyn Koch1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJackie Kemp / Lynne Aranda vs Janis Wommack / Kimberly Weldon3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Dee Lorkovic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Monica Kosta
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Deborah Owens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Jackie Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Renee Weatherford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Huong Edmondson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kathy Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lynne Aranda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Myrtha Horton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susana Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Kemp + Dee Lorkovic5844% games−1.8% vs expected
Monica Kosta + Dee Lorkovic224 matchesnot enough data
Huong Edmondson + Monica Kosta033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dee Lorkovic
23W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Monica Kosta
10W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Deborah Owens
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Jackie Kemp
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Renee Weatherford
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Huong Edmondson
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Kathy Hogan
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynne Aranda
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Myrtha Horton
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susana Trevino
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.