Teams

1-KOrr-CHTC

2022 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · Eno River 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-16vs 3-KCuller-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanne Beckley / Beth Spinarski vs Susan Long / Patty Mathena6-0, 6-0
2022-09-09vs 4-KHoekstra-HRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Jane Thrailkill vs Brynn Hale / Donna Ware6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesUlrike Foley / Jeanne Beckley vs Tracy Fletcher / Karen Sindelar6-2, 6-4
2022-09-02vs 5-NDraughon-HVFWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Ulrike Foley vs Eleanor Hoover / Angela Baxley6-3, 6-2
2022-08-19vs 2-JHensley-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Karen Wood vs Christine Peeples / Michelle Fitzgerald6-2, 6-4
2022-08-12vs 3-KCuller-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Diane Adams vs Sheana Funkhouser / Beth Loeb2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathy Orr / Beth Spinarski vs Kaye Culler / Mary Tusing6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynne Farber / Ulrike Foley vs Virginia Lee / Linda Sheldon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-05vs 4-KHoekstra-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Spinarski / Elizabeth Keating vs Brynn Hale / Tracy Fletcher1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Adrianne Leinbach
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.64
Ulrike Foley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
3.47
Jeanne Beckley
published
3.33
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.26
Beth Spinarski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Virginia Higuchi
published
3.14
Jane Thrailkill
published
3.13
Lynne Farber
published
Kathy Orr
published
Valerie Conklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrianne Leinbach + Beth Spinarski2348% gamesnot enough data
Ulrike Foley + Adrianne Leinbach224 matchesnot enough data
Adrianne Leinbach + Jeanne Beckley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–225L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Ulrike Foley
81W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Elizabeth Keating
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jeanne Beckley
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
37W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Beth Spinarski
117W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Virginia Higuchi
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jane Thrailkill
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lynne Farber
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kathy Orr
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Conklin
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.