Teams

2 MRTC Battery Park Spivack

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-04vs 6 Willow Oaks PerronLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Jimmy Qing vs John Chenault V / Hector Valentin3-6, 5-7
2023-05-21vs 4 Westwood GodseyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Wheeler Dey vs Kevin Calhoun / Casey Coffey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStuart McCroskey / Donnell Stewart vs William Camper / Raymond Kanyo3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-20vs 5 Ridgetop LefkowitzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJohn Foust / Donnell Stewart vs Ethan Edwards / Adam Plotkin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Bennett / Wheeler Dey vs Seth Nelson / Michael Shafer1-6, 4-6
2023-05-13vs 3 Woodlake PattersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Wayne Motley vs Bradley Glen / Chris Grinnell1-6, 0-6
2023-05-07vs 7 ACAC JohnstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Eric Spivack vs Robert Johnston / Eric Nelson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWheeler Dey / Donnell Stewart vs Michael Cable / Stephen Welt6-4, 6-0
2023-04-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonnell Stewart / John Bennett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16vs 8 Morgan's Stand at James RiverLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Chuck Snow vs Will Kaufmann / Dale Nowery2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Spivack / Donnell Stewart vs Sung Kang / Brett Sinsabaugh3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-02vs 6 Willow Oaks PerronWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Chuck Snow vs Thomas Huffman / Timothy Moore6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Tucker Ottaway
published
4.33
Stuart McCroskey
published
4.24
Michael Baxter
published
4.22
Wheeler Dey
published
4.22
Chuck Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Jimmy Qing
published
4.14
Wayne Motley
published
4.09
Donnell Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
John Foust
published
3.85
John Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Eric Spivack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chuck Snow + John Bennett465750% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tucker Ottaway
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
Stuart McCroskey
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
Michael Baxter
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.24
Wheeler Dey
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Chuck Snow
172W–207L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Jimmy Qing
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Wayne Motley
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Donnell Stewart
76W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
John Foust
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
John Bennett
180W–157L career · 8 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.85
Eric Spivack
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.