Teams

New Wave

2022 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Angel Amponsah
published 4.5
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.76
Layna Kelly
published
3.74
Winny Zhang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.60
Kirah Yen
published
Joy Wu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Layna Kelly + Angel Amponsah314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angel Amponsah
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
Lucy Wang
33W–16L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
Layna Kelly
43W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Kirah Yen
42W–29L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Joy Wu
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.