Teams

St.King18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-13vs La.McRee18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Palanzo / Kelly Baltzer vs Valerie Clowes / Shannon Grady1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Thompson / Bethany Stempien vs Lanier McRee / Mary Evans6-3, 6-2
2024-05-07vs Me.Dougher18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Bosnjak King / Bethany Stempien vs Amy Willard / Amy Whitaker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-06vs Ke.Blevins18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Baltzer / Emily Palanzo vs Kelly Blevins / Kelly Talbot4-6, 0-6
2024-04-22vs De.Farmer18A2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesBethany Stempien / Elizabeth Rupert vs Kacey Barcliff / Deja Buckner6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Palanzo vs Katherine Clarida7-6, 6-1
2024-04-08vs Su.Albion18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesBethany Stempien / Elizabeth Rupert vs Susie Albion / Ashley Grantham4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Baltzer vs Alise Fredrickson0-6, 0-6
2024-04-01vs St.Fogarty18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesBethany Stempien / Kelly Thompson vs Cheri Kivisto / Heath Hilliker1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Bosnjak King / Emily Palanzo vs Kim Manning / Amanda Brandon3-6, 5-7
2024-03-18vs Ta.Yasin18A2.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Baltzer vs Matalaba Napier3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-11vs Ka.Landi18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnie Dimitroff / Bethany Stempien vs Christine Stone / Michelle Vanstory2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Baltzer vs Katie Landi6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Elizabeth Rupert
published 3
2.99
Katie Warren
published
2.48
Kelly Baltzer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.48
Emily Palanzo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Bethany Stempien
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Connie Dimitroff
published 2.5
2.08
Diane Bosnjak King
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Warren + Elizabeth Rupert3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Rupert
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
Katie Warren
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
2.5
Kelly Baltzer
36W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Emily Palanzo
21W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Bethany Stempien
78W–106L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Connie Dimitroff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Diane Bosnjak King
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.