Teams

HHager (Springfield); Dynamic Duo

2024-2025 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.0 Women Doubles; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-01-29vs SGerry/PSweeney (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErica Turkus / Joy Furchner vs Patty Sweeney / Sumi Gerry6-0, 6-4
2024-12-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Hagar / Jen Abernathy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-17vs JJZhu (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesVolree Wade / Joy Furchner vs Carrie Gilman / Viviane Bechtler-Smith6-3, 6-4
2024-12-10vs MAdinolfi (JCC); Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJen Abernathy / Melissa Warren vs Tina Rogovin / Lisa Cosolito6-3, 6-2
2024-12-08vs LDarfler (Life Time); KRDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJen Abernathy / Heather Hagar vs Lisa Darfler / Amy Rottman7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-12-05vs DBiggers/Davis (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Martin / Joy Furchner vs Deborah Biggers / Mary Davis6-2, 6-1
2024-11-18vs JKilduff (Sardis); Net GainsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Furchner / Melissa Warren vs Judy Kilduff / Lindsay Thompson6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs SSmaston/RHaug (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Hagar / Joy Furchner vs Sharon Smaston / Robyn Haug6-3, 6-2
2024-11-05vs STrivanovic (Blakeney); Las ChicasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Abernathy / Melissa Warren vs Shanin Trivanovic / Paulina Coello4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Doubles; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Joy Furchner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.41
Jen Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Heather Hagar
published
Melissa Warren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Hagar + Jen Abernathy224 matchesnot enough data
Joy Furchner + Jen Abernathy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joy Furchner
67W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
3
Jen Abernathy
29W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Heather Hagar
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Warren
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.