Teams

Brennan

2022 40&Over Women · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-20vs Buff: SalvatoreWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Julie Cimorelli vs Cheryl Turner / Nancy Wingerter6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Shuman Hua vs Nancy Rehak / Carol Salvatore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJune Brennan / Melissa Dambrowski vs Molly Connerton / Nelida Sanchez6-4, 6-2
2022-07-06vs Buff: SalvatoreSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Claudia Smolinski vs Silva Banboukian Serghany / Rowena de Perio6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShen Lim vs Molly Connerton6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Kelly / April Zolczer vs Nancy Rehak / Michele McGrath1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Dambrowski / Misty Kaminski vs Karen Hughes / Nelida Sanchez7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-29vs Buff: SalvatoreLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberlee Danieu / Claudia Smolinski vs Jan Coleman / Michele McGrath2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Dambrowski vs Molly Connerton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShen Lim / April Zolczer vs Teresa Arena / Nancy Wingerter1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAudrey Cohn / June Brennan vs Cheryl Turner / Nelida Sanchez6-2, 6-3
2022-06-22vs Buff: SalvatoreLost 13
W#1 DoublesJulie Cimorelli / Lisa Abeyounis vs Mary Ann Grande / Nancy Rehak6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShuman Hua vs Carol Salvatore3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesApril Zolczer / Tara Hart-Nova vs Teresa Arena / Cheryl Turner5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Carbaugh / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Karen Hughes / Nancy Wingerter3-6, 1-6
2022-06-08vs Buff: SalvatoreLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Lisa Abeyounis vs Jan Coleman / Michele McGrath4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShuman Hua vs Molly Connerton5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJune Brennan / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Rowena de Perio / Silva Banboukian Serghany1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buff: Salvatore0513716147
2Brennan0571328203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Oconnell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Claudia Smolinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Misty Kaminski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.45
June Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Tara Hart-Nova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
April Zolczer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Ruggiero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Melissa Dambrowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jordan Dorsey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Julie Cimorelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberlee Danieu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Abeyounis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shen Lim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Shuman Hua
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Kaminski + Cheryl Oconnell6266% games+13.7% vs expected
Lisa Abeyounis + Audrey Cohn6357% games+6.4% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + Audrey Cohn4164% games+3.2% vs expected
Audrey Cohn + Jordan Dorsey4157% games+2.6% vs expected
Shen Lim + April Zolczer19658% games+2.2% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + June Brennan5356% games+1.8% vs expected
Tara Hart-Nova + Kimberlee Danieu5449% games−0.5% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + Misty Kaminski4453% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Oconnell
61W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Claudia Smolinski
47W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Misty Kaminski
70W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 9 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
June Brennan
46W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Tara Hart-Nova
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
April Zolczer
48W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Ruggiero
70W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Melissa Dambrowski
16W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.15
Jordan Dorsey
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Cimorelli
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberlee Danieu
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Abeyounis
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shen Lim
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shuman Hua
58W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.