Teams

EFSC - Zavaleta

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-16vs Brevard/Flores/Combo18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Norman Hosan vs Daniel Evans / Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues1-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs Kiwi - RamseySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoel Mayer / Norman Hosan vs Rafael Reyes / Benjamin Smith1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Isidro Zavaleta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-25vs Brevard/Flores/Combo18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Norman Hosan vs Jason Abbott / Michael Phelipa4-6, 3-6
2025-09-11vs Kiwi - RamseyLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Norman Hosan vs Stephen Ramsey / Justin Hertzog5-7, 4-6
2025-08-27vs Kiwi - RamseyLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Nico San Nicolas vs Richard Boysen / Michael Carpenter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Mayer / Norman Hosan vs Nathan Dickens / Chad McCall1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Kleber Fukamizu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Thomas Tolles
published
3.83
Nico San Nicolas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Andy McConnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
William Honaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Isidro Zavaleta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Kyle McIntosh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Norman Hosan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Alexandre de Chabert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Thomas Eskridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Tolles + William Honaker224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kleber Fukamizu
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Thomas Tolles
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Nico San Nicolas
42W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Andy McConnell
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
William Honaker
66W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Isidro Zavaleta
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Kyle McIntosh
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Norman Hosan
97W–112L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Alexandre de Chabert
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Thomas Eskridge
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.