Teams

Bartlett/Lakewood/STC

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-11vs Reding/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesHope Rider / Kelly Baird vs Christine Castillo / Sydney Breaker3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Compton / Casey Lozada vs Holly Reding / Siobahn Hruby6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Dymna / Kelly Lincicome vs Stephanie Byers / Jennifer Bobbitt6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Stanford/LR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Martin / Grace Evans vs Flora Lucia De La Garza Bayon / Cheryl Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Garison / Casey Bartlett vs Kyndra McCrillis / Karen Shepherd1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Compton / Florencia Bruzatori vs Mary Claire McLaurin / Brandilyn Morris6-0, 6-2
2026-07-29vs DGarretson/LR/BPWon 21
L#1 DoublesHope Rider / Susan Gammill vs Schelle Fike / Deanna Garretson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCasey Bartlett / Florencia Bruzatori vs Julie Enderlin / Sara Bryant6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSandra Higgins / Lauren Dymna vs Melissa Herbert / Jennifer O Kelley6-2, 6-3
2026-07-26vs Stanford/LR/BPLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Martin / Kelly Baird vs Bernadette Stanford / Calandra Bucella6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCasey Bartlett / Sandra Higgins vs Denise Allen-Duff / Leah Welker3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Lincicome / Lauren Dymna vs Mary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn1-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs Allison/Junior/Benton/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Martin / Susan Gammill vs Sheri Green / Autumn Hemphill3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesFlorencia Bruzatori / Casey Bartlett vs Lisa Moreland / Brenda Green3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKelly Lincicome / Jennifer Compton vs Melissa Johnston / Angelia Mckenney6-3, 6-4
2026-07-21vs Reding/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Baird / Hope Rider vs Holly Reding / Heather Larsen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSandra Higgins / Hannah Garison vs Siobahn Hruby / Betsy Peeler3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Lincicome / Chanda Price vs Jennifer Bobbitt / Stephanie Pace6-4, 5-6
2026-06-28vs Allison/Junior/Benton/OCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Higgins / Chanda Price vs Melissa Johnston / Angelia Mckenney6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHannah Garison / Elizabeth Eanes vs Elizabeth Cook / Melissa Buck1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGrace Evans / Hope Rider vs Autumn Hemphill / Jill Childers1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-24vs DGarretson/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrace Evans / Denise Martin vs Deanna Garretson / Schelle Fike6-3, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHannah Garison / Casey Lozada vs Patricia Savary / Charleen Francis7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Dymna / Kelly Lincicome vs Melissa Herbert / La Tonya Richardson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stanford/LR/BP6115613132
2Bartlett/Lakewood/STC53141025216
3Reding/LR/Reb43111016170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Susan Gammill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Hope Rider
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Kelly Baird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Grace Evans
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Casey Lozada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Elizabeth Eanes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Casey Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Jennifer Compton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Kelly Lincicome
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Lauren Dymna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Florencia Bruzatori
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Chanda Price
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.31
Hannah Garison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Sandra Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Florencia Bruzatori + Jennifer Compton3257% games+12.3% vs expected
Florencia Bruzatori + Casey Bartlett1440% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Lincicome + Lauren Dymna314 matchesnot enough data
Casey Bartlett + Chanda Price033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Gammill
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Hope Rider
16W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Kelly Baird
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Grace Evans
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Casey Lozada
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Elizabeth Eanes
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Casey Bartlett
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Compton
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
Kelly Lincicome
16W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Lauren Dymna
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Florencia Bruzatori
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Chanda Price
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
Hannah Garison
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
Sandra Higgins
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.