Teams

SUTTER LAWN 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-02vs BROADSTONE RC 40AM4.0BSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTim Johnson / Paul Gee vs Greg Violette / Mark Andorf3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKeyan Fallahi vs Cyrus Orandi3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Carroll / Oscar Watson vs Michael Dozier / Vansen Wong6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLyndall Baker / Andy Carey vs Thomas Kim / Kris Jornlin6-3, 7-6
2025-01-11vs BROADSTONE RC 40AM4.0BLost 13
L#1 DoublesTim Johnson / Gavin McClure vs Greg Violette / Darin Carlsen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelvin Kwan vs William Bunce6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Gee / Chris Keithley vs John Sedar / Thomas Kim6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Carroll / Oscar Watson vs Eric Roscoe / Frederick Anderson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Paul Gee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Oscar Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Gavin McClure
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kelvin Kwan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Lyndall Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
3.68
Webb Stallings
published
3.67
Keyan Fallahi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Michael Conway
published
3.58
Gerald Zavorsky
published 4
3.55
Chris Keithley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Andy Carey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joseph Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Oscar Watson + Joseph Carroll314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Gee
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
Oscar Watson
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Gavin McClure
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Kelvin Kwan
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lyndall Baker
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Darrell Steinberg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Webb Stallings
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Keyan Fallahi
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Michael Conway
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Gerald Zavorsky
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Chris Keithley
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Andy Carey
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Joseph Carroll
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.