Teams

ITA Atlanta (Jelena Subotic)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 3.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Traci Leong
published
2.98
Lori Hinkle
published
2.83
M Woods
published
2.71
Yolanda Chu
published
2.67
Fariba Kharazmi
published
2.65
Kim Buckwalter
published
2.63
Jennifer Denbo
published
2.59
Jelena Subotic
published
2.46
Klare McKee
published
2.39
Karen Katz
published
2.34
Michele Marill
published
Cheryl Taylor
published 2.5
Brenda Dozier
published
Dolores Byrd
published
Julie Lincenberg
published
Katherine Koops
published
Lark Morgan
published
Patti Richards
published
Sundari Raju
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Marill + Kim Buckwalter3442% games−12.9% vs expected
Dolores Byrd + Klare McKee0628% gamesnot enough data
Karen Katz + Jennifer Denbo1433% gamesnot enough data
Karen Katz + Sundari Raju1433% gamesnot enough data
Jelena Subotic + Jennifer Denbo2346% gamesnot enough data
Fariba Kharazmi + Karen Katz134 matchesnot enough data
Jelena Subotic + Traci Leong404 matchesnot enough data
Patti Richards + Sundari Raju044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Leong
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Lori Hinkle
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
M Woods
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Yolanda Chu
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Fariba Kharazmi
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kim Buckwalter
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Jennifer Denbo
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Jelena Subotic
11W–27L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Klare McKee
10W–46L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Karen Katz
10W–50L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Michele Marill
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.34
2.5
Cheryl Taylor
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Brenda Dozier
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Dolores Byrd
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Lincenberg
5W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Koops
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lark Morgan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Richards
2W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sundari Raju
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.