Teams

LAGUNA CREEK CW8.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Lianne Decker
published
4.30
Leandra Neal
published
4.30
Jane Fortner
published
4.19
Fritzie Dorais
published 4.5
4.14
4.02
Courtney Guetschow
published 4.5
3.91
Jessica Chancellor
published
3.89
Holly Pon
published 4
3.88
Eva Wilson-Lee
published 4
3.80
Terry Sandoval
published
3.75
Myrthel Daquis
published
3.75
Dianna Gillaspie
published 4
Gina Fong
published 4
3.73
Marika Fujimoto
published
3.69
May Zipp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Fortner + Lianne Decker7461% games−0.9% vs expected
Marika Fujimoto + Jennifer Fong-Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Eva Wilson-Lee + Jennifer Fong-Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lianne Decker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
Leandra Neal
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Jane Fortner
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Fritzie Dorais
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Marissa Fullum-Campbell
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Courtney Guetschow
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Jessica Chancellor
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Holly Pon
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Eva Wilson-Lee
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Terry Sandoval
19W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Myrthel Daquis
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dianna Gillaspie
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gina Fong
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marika Fujimoto
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
May Zipp
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.