Teams

Camilla/Anglin

2024 Flint River USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Winegardner vs Anna Lee2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-10vs Flint River/Kim ThriffileyLost 02
L#1 SinglesKelley Corbari vs Fang Liang7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Bassett / Jennifer Winegardner vs Kim Thriffiley / Lisa Franson0-6, 6-7
2024-03-03vs Flint River/Kim ThriffileyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarson Parker / Kelley Corbari vs Kim Thriffiley / Jennifer Kjellerup2-6, 0-6
2024-02-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesKelley Corbari vs Fang Liang6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Renee Vaughn
published
3.53
Brandi Byce
published 4
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Cindy Anglin
published 4
3.40
Kelley Corbari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Joan Bassett
published
3.26
Becky Bush
published 3.5
3.19
Carson Parker
published 3.5
JaneMarie Dinnerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Corbari + Becky Bush14859% games+7.5% vs expected
Jennifer Winegardner + Becky Bush9743% games−3.5% vs expected
Kelley Corbari + Jennifer Winegardner4846% games−6.6% vs expected
JaneMarie Dinnerman + Cindy Anglin3260% gamesnot enough data
Renee Vaughn + Cindy Anglin2348% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Corbari + JaneMarie Dinnerman044 matchesnot enough data
JaneMarie Dinnerman + Becky Bush123 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Byce + Cindy Anglin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Vaughn
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Brandi Byce
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Cindy Anglin
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Kelley Corbari
177W–180L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.40
Joan Bassett
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Becky Bush
33W–33L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Carson Parker
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
JaneMarie Dinnerman
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.