Teams

Leslie Echols

2025 Springfield Adult 40 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-23vs MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarla Duff / Abigail Chastain vs Stephanie Wachob / Debby Hunter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Hunt / Susan Gravatt vs Tami Murphy / Jane Gardner6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-16vs MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Mitrenga / Susan Gravatt vs Kim Vinton / Lorry Brown3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Chastain vs Jane Gardner6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Hunt / Sandra Sanders vs Peggy Lindsey / Susy Barr1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-09vs MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Mitrenga / Carla Duff vs Stephanie Wachob / Katherine Vandeven6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Sanders / Susan Gravatt vs Tami Murphy / Debby Hunter3-6, 2-6
2025-06-25vs MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Cox / Carla Duff vs Susy Barr / Peggy Lindsey4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Pell / Lori Hunt vs Stephanie Wachob / Debby Hunter2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Gravatt / Sandra Sanders vs Carol Rollins / Megan Terry7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Leslie Echols
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Debbie Pell
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Sandra Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Carla Duff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Abigail Chastain
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Mitrenga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Hunt
published
Melissa Cox
published
Susan Gravatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Echols + Debbie Pell5451% games+7.3% vs expected
Susan Gravatt + Leslie Echols314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Mitrenga + Debbie Pell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Echols
111W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Debbie Pell
112W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Sandra Sanders
49W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Carla Duff
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Abigail Chastain
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Kimberly Mitrenga
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lori Hunt
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Cox
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Gravatt
29W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.