Teams

IE-Bear Creek-Carr

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Men 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-16vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarshall Sharifan / Randy Sinnett vs Robert Hogan / Mark Schmitt7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Epler / Ray Fisher vs Ming Ye / Guangyuan Hu5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDon Hosch / Darrell Millsap vs Steve Kimble / michael kovach6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-26vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Sinnett / Marshall Sharifan vs Bruce Nguyen / Tommy Cramer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesXin Zhou / James Epler vs Mark Schmitt / Steve Kimble2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDon Hosch / Qinghai Peng vs Ming Ye / Guangyuan Hu1-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Carr / Darrell Millsap vs Ming Ye / Steve Kimble4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Epler / Edwin Ustariz vs Peter Armstrong / Jinghua Tang2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Collie / Richard Layon vs Zhi Du / michael kovach6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-19vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Layon / Robert Linton vs Ming Ye / Guangyuan Hu6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDon Hosch / Darrell Millsap vs Bruce Nguyen / Tommy Cramer4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRay Fisher / Xin Zhou vs Zhi Du / michael kovach6-7, 2-1
2026-07-12vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancis de Giorgio / Xin Zhou vs Peter Armstrong / michael kovach2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRay Fisher / James Epler vs Bruce Nguyen / Guangyuan Hu7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarshall Sharifan / Edwin Ustariz vs Zhi Du / Jinghua Tang4-6, 2-5
2026-07-12vs IE-LLW-Bleu Birds Special-NguyenWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Carr / Edwin Ustariz vs Zhi Du / michael kovach3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Layon / Robert Linton vs Mark Schmitt / Robert Hogan7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Benner / Qinghai Peng vs Guangyuan Hu / Jinghua Tang3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · IE Men 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IE-Bleu Birds Special-Nguyen5114412135
2IE-Bear Creek-Carr1541430207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Richard Layon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Scott Carr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Ray Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Don Hosch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.78
Francis de Giorgio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
James Epler
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Randy Sinnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Edwin Ustariz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Donald Collie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Darrell Millsap
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
John Benner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marshall Sharifan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Qinghai Peng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Linton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Xin Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edwin Ustariz + James Epler224 matchesnot enough data
Edwin Ustariz + Donald Collie123 matchesnot enough data
Edwin Ustariz + Darrell Millsap303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard Layon
61W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.24
Scott Carr
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Ray Fisher
51W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
Don Hosch
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Francis de Giorgio
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
James Epler
67W–70L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Randy Sinnett
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Edwin Ustariz
106W–96L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Donald Collie
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Darrell Millsap
21W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
John Benner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marshall Sharifan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Qinghai Peng
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Linton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Xin Zhou
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.