Teams

Broward/Veltri - Gonzalez/Contreras

2022 Broward Adult 55 & Over - Night · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-15vs Veltri - Chen/EseverriWon 10
W#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Jeanne Sierra vs Teri DiGiulian / France Gaudreau6-2, 6-2
2022-03-01vs Veltri - Chen/EseverriWon 10
W#2 DoublesSima Sadoughi / Clarena Furtado vs Evis Cartagena / France Gaudreau6-3, 6-1
2022-02-15vs Veltri - Chen/EseverriWon 20
W#1 DoublesClarena Furtado / Sima Sadoughi vs Yonghong Chen / Lory Strickland6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Quinton / Karen Ventosa vs Phyllis Volanti / Melvina Williams6-2, 6-1
2022-02-01vs Veltri - Chen/EseverriWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalia de Gregorio / Sima Sadoughi vs Christine Bonitto-Moore / Evis Cartagena6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Quinton / Karen Ventosa vs Sue Miller / Teri DiGiulian6-1, 6-0
2022-01-18vs Veltri - Chen/EseverriLost 01
L#1 DoublesLoren Levine / Sara Contreras vs Yonghong Chen / Lory Strickland3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Loren Levine
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.62
3.62
Natalia de Gregorio
published
3.58
Sigal Sasson
published
3.31
Jennifer Quinton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Elisabeth Weiss
published 3.5
3.23
Karen Ventosa
published
3.08
Robin Hayden
published
3.05
Sima Sadoughi
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Jeanne Wickwire
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
ELIZABETH GORDILLO
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Natalia de Gregorio
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Sigal Sasson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jennifer Quinton
256W–134L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elisabeth Weiss
31W–75L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Karen Ventosa
36W–32L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Robin Hayden
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Sima Sadoughi
207W–136L career · 8 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jeanne Wickwire
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.