Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs BM REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Jenny Kelly / Aree Bly7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShari Newton vs Lori Davis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Carolyn Schilling / Sandy McGregor7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Tiffany Gerken vs Julie Pontiff / Gretchen Morrison3-6, 5-7
2024-07-09vs KC-CC SILVERSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Michelle Ziemian / Erin Barnett3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShari Newton vs Anne Fox6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa McGavern / Kelly Lessman vs Brenna Simpson / Elizabeth Pike0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Larsen / Sarah Phillips vs Lauri Lehan / Dianne Sandy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-02vs CCC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Shari Newton vs Debbie McGough / Sally Pearson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristine Maleri vs Rebecca Shefte3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Kerri Luther / Heather Varnell7-6, 7-6
2024-06-25vs HRCA-N BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKristine Maleri / Denise Larsen vs Michelle Millet / Debbie Lew6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Duque vs Carey Devin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Phillips / Carla Gamet vs Michele Regis / Katherine Flecky3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Tiffany Gerken vs Monica Greenfield / Corinne Flemister4-6, 3-6
2024-06-18vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Valerie Koenig / Tanya Cote4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristine Maleri vs Amy Babington7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Lessman / Lisa McGavern vs Debra Etzel / Erin Maloney2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristie Bianco / Tiffany Gerken vs Laurni Blanchard / Ann Patel5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-11vs KC-RH REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarla Gamet / Shari Newton vs Jill Strietelmeier / Sheila Gossen5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLisa McGavern vs Leigh Hardin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Gerken / Kelly Lessman vs Debbie Lathrop / Candice Saxon2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristine Maleri / Denise Larsen vs Terri Jennings / Jody Dart6-3, 6-3
2024-06-04vs PH REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesShari Newton / Carla Gamet vs Michelle Campbell / Kristine Kuettel6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristine Maleri vs Arlene Cole7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Phillips / Christie Bianco vs Christina Quigley / Karen Calderone6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Larsen / Hanne Schauer vs Peggy Block / Wynne Freeman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Rebecca Duque
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.78
Shari Newton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.77
Carla Gamet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Kristine Maleri
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Denise Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Christie Bianco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Kelly Lessman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Hanne Schauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Lisa McGavern
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Tiffany Gerken
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Duque + Carla Gamet472853% games−0.4% vs expected
Kelly Lessman + Lisa McGavern132445% games−1.3% vs expected
Denise Larsen + Rebecca Duque11553% games−1.9% vs expected
Tiffany Gerken + Lisa McGavern11138% games−3.3% vs expected
Kristine Maleri + Rebecca Duque1445% games−3.3% vs expected
Kristine Maleri + Denise Larsen3547% games−4.1% vs expected
Christie Bianco + Lisa McGavern1740% games−5.8% vs expected
Tiffany Gerken + Kelly Lessman51344% games−6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Duque
132W–117L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.81
Shari Newton
99W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Carla Gamet
127W–86L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kristine Maleri
59W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Denise Larsen
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christie Bianco
26W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Kelly Lessman
24W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Hanne Schauer
31W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Lisa McGavern
67W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Tiffany Gerken
15W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.