Teams

IE--LLW-Elevenis-Ngo

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-03vs IE-San Sevaine-Misfits-WestLost 01
L#2 DoublesMax Austin / Matthew Boland vs Darrell Millsap / Ehab Ateia6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2024-10-26vs IE-RCCC-LiWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Lee / Max Austin vs Qianfeng Li / Taiwei Chen6-0, 6-0
2024-10-20vs IE-Bear Valley-MejiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMax Austin / Kevin Lu vs Marius Sava / JORGE CARBAJAL6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-13vs IE-TCC-CardonaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Boland / Max Austin vs Tom Cardona / Dennis Ho6-1, 6-0
2024-10-06vs IE-MTC-MastersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMax Austin / Humberto Salcido vs Jeff Cane / Ray Miller6-0, 6-2
2024-09-28vs IE-San Sevaine-Misfits-WestLost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Tomoyasu / Max Austin vs James Hoffman / Wayne West4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Quang Tran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Max Austin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Jie Mei
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Ken Tomoyasu
published
3.50
Humberto Salcido
published
3.40
Vu Le
published
3.38
Charles Chaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Matthew Boland
published
3.31
Anh Tran
published 3.5
3.28
Le Thuan
published
3.28
Phi Ngo
published
Gerard Tan-Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phi Ngo + Charles Chaya3246% games+2.6% vs expected
Anh Tran + Le Thuan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Quang Tran
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Max Austin
48W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Jie Mei
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Ken Tomoyasu
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Humberto Salcido
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Vu Le
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Charles Chaya
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Matthew Boland
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Anh Tran
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Le Thuan
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Phi Ngo
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Gerard Tan-Torres
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.