Teams

Kang/18/2.5/CWN/XU

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Muscenti /18/2.5/CWN/CP000000
2Boyd/Whealdon/18/2.5/CWN/CP000000
3Kang/18/2.5/CWN/XU000000
4Williamson/18/2.5/CWN/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Madison McCall
published
2.71
Ji Kang
published
2.45
Francesca Brighty
published
2.35
Anne Winston
published 2.5
2.26
Jennifer Toups
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Aukena Long
published 2.5
Belinda Janeski
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison McCall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.09
Ji Kang
1W–19L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.71
Francesca Brighty
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Anne Winston
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Jennifer Toups
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Aukena Long
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Belinda Janeski
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.