Teams

Steigner/18/6.5/NOD/CP

2023 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

22 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Lauren Tafaro
published
3.37
Julie Purdy
published
3.31
Julie Steigner
published
3.27
Jessica Kee
published
Alexis Paredes
published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Dugan
published
3.05
Catherine Lim
published 3
3.05
Kelly Rose
published
3.02
Leslie Clark
published
2.93
Lacey Charvet
published
2.92
Melissa Maia
published
2.89
Vanessa Gehring
published
2.73
Lauren England
published
2.71
Ana Aguilera
published 3
2.71
Lauren Chiu
published
2.68
Sophia Hamm
published
2.65
Kimberly Buchler
published
2.56
Victoria Judge
published
Maddie Conner
published
Marcela Seerman
published
Maria Bazan
published
Stephanie Boh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Chiu + Lacey Charvet9954% games+2.4% vs expected
Marcela Seerman + Maria Bazan2838% games−4.8% vs expected
Julie Steigner + Lauren Tafaro224 matchesnot enough data
Sophia Hamm + Melissa Maia033 matchesnot enough data
Lauren England + Melissa Maia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Tafaro
83W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.97
Julie Purdy
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Julie Steigner
44W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Jessica Kee
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alexis Paredes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heidi Dugan
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Catherine Lim
51W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kelly Rose
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Leslie Clark
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.02
Lacey Charvet
35W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Melissa Maia
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Vanessa Gehring
27W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lauren England
28W–38L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ana Aguilera
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Lauren Chiu
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Sophia Hamm
20W–32L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Kimberly Buchler
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Victoria Judge
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.56
Maddie Conner
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcela Seerman
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Bazan
7W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Boh
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.