Teams

OC Meta Legend - Heritage Park Irvine - Gu

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Men - 4.0 - 3.5 - 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-22vs OC Heritage Park Irvine - SeanWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Truong / Frank Ye vs Zachary Winkle / Jeffrey Feng6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-31vs OC Trouble Makers YLCC - AlanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Truong / Wenyi Jiang vs Jeff Rhode / Vagner Finelli0-6, 2-6
2024-07-28vs OC YLCC - RyanLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Chou / DJ Zheng vs Kyle Kierulff / Ryan Freimann7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Men - 4.0 - 3.5 - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Cedric Lozano
published 4.5
4.14
Kevin Thoeng
published 4.5
3.88
Ricardo Yamazaki
published
3.84
NICHOLAS LAU
published
3.83
Bryan Chou
published 4
3.81
Eric Liu
published
DJ Zheng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Chen-Jun Huang
published 4
3.67
Victor Wu
published
3.49
Justin Truong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Gustavus Bernal
published
3.29
Mark Gross
published
Li Xu
published
Michael Gu
published
Paarth Rathod
published
Paul G Batten
published
Sean Batten
published
Wenyi Jiang
published
Ziyao Guo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cedric Lozano
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Kevin Thoeng
116W–39L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Ricardo Yamazaki
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
NICHOLAS LAU
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Bryan Chou
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Eric Liu
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
DJ Zheng
43W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Chen-Jun Huang
24W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Victor Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Justin Truong
86W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Gustavus Bernal
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Mark Gross
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Li Xu
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Gu
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paarth Rathod
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul G Batten
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Batten
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wenyi Jiang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ziyao Guo
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.